top of page
  • Raygen Magiera

The 80/20 Rule and South Africa: Chasing Unity or Superficial Fixes?

The 80/20 rule, also known as the Pareto Principle, has long been a staple in the business world. It suggests that 80% of outcomes result from just 20% of inputs. This concept has transcended its origins and found its way into various facets of life, including relationships, health, and even national unity. In recent weeks, it seems that South Africa, a nation grappling with discrimination, racism, division, corruption, and inequality, has inadvertently adopted the 80/20 principle in the pursuit of unity. But is this approach genuinely helping the country address its deep-rooted issues, or is it merely a superficial fix?

Before delving into the South African context, it's essential to understand how the 80/20 rule has been applied in other areas of life. In relationships, the rule warns against fixating on the superficial 20% of a partnership while neglecting the critical 80%, which includes stability, love, and friendship. Similarly, in health, it's often suggested that achieving a balanced lifestyle involves 80% healthy eating and 20% exercise. These principles highlight the importance of focusing on what truly matters for sustainable and meaningful outcomes.

South Africa has been struggling with a multitude of issues, including discrimination, racism, division, corruption, and inequality. These challenges have led to a fragmented society in dire need of unity and healing. Recently, the power of sports has been hailed as an event that can spark unity. The South African Rugby World Cup victory, for example, temporarily united the nation, providing a welcome respite from the daily struggles faced by its citizens. In the wake of this victory, it seems that South Africa has unconsciously adopted the 80/20 principle. The nation has latched onto the 20% of unity and celebration that sports offer, effectively forgetting the underlying 80% of pressing issues. This superficial fix has given South Africans a fleeting high, but it is proving to be an unsustainable solution. The recent controversy over the timing of President Ramaphosa holding the rugby trophy seconds after Siya Kolisi exemplifies how this unity can quickly turn divisive. The debate surrounding this has reignited the race issue in South Africa. While the nation strives for unity, the 80/20 principle has inadvertently created division, highlighting underlying tensions that still persist. The question now is whether South Africa can truly unite as a country or continue to rely on events that offer a temporary, shallow sense of unity.

South Africa is at a critical juncture. It's clear that unity cannot be achieved through superficial fixes like sporting victories alone. The nation's leaders are under scrutiny, with many questioning their competence. Even parties with clean audits have been unable to bring about the transformative change that South Africa desperately needs.

As South Africa grapples with its complex challenges, it must look beyond the 80/20 principle and tackle the underlying issues head-on. It's time for a more comprehensive and sustainable approach to unity, one that addresses discrimination, racism, division, corruption, and inequality systematically. A genuine and lasting sense of unity can only be achieved through meaningful, long-term solutions that address the root causes of the nation's problems. Superficial fixes may offer temporary relief, but the path to true unity and progress requires a more comprehensive and inclusive effort.


bottom of page